Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Concentrix Corporation
How Concentrix Corporation stacks up
CNXC · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #249 of 497 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CNXC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -126.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -24.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 30.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNXC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNXC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | -124.0% | 2.0% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 18.0% | 4.0% | 97% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 27.2% | 3.3% | 99% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 93.8% | 23.0% | 92% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNXC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.8B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 791M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 377M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 243 | 8.1B USD | 48 | 70 | |
| 243 | 525M USD | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score