Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNX · against 112 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 113 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CNX · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 113 reported | 0.49× | 0.56× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 114 reported | 0.61 | 0.51 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 112 reported | 0.72× | 1.45× | 14% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 4 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 62 | 8.4B CAD (≈$6.2B) | 43 | 53 | |
| 63 | 8.8B AUD (≈$5.8B) | 41 | 57 | |
| 64 | 3.8B USD | 40 | 65 | |
| 65 | 4.7B USD | 37 | 56 | |
| 66 | 5.4B USD | 37 | 78 | |
| 67 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 77 | |
| 68 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 35 | 43 | |
| 69 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 34 | 65 | |
| 70 | 4.0B USD | 34 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score