Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CONMED Corporation
How CONMED Corporation stacks up
CNMD · against 417 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #288 of 418 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score59 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including CNMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.0% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNMD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 422 reported | 3.4% | 5.4% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 230 reported | -47.0% | 8.3% | 9% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 410 reported | 6.4% | 6.3% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNMD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 1 | 885M USD | 99 | 33 | |
| 288 | 16.3B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 28 | 49 | |
| 288 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 28 | 28 | |
| 288 | 2.8B USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 288 | 1.6B USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 288 | 1.4B USD | 28 | 42 | |
| 296 | 6.5B CNY (≈$908M) | 27 | 62 | |
| 296 | 5.3B CNY (≈$748M) | 27 | 61 | |
| 296 | 5.8B HKD (≈$739M) | 27 | 44 | |
| 296 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 27 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score