Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CONMED Corporation
How CONMED Corporation stacks up
CNMD · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #358 of 455 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score34 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including CNMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.0% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNMD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 3.4% | 11.0% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | -47.0% | 21.2% | 12% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 6.4% | 11.0% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNMD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 460M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 441M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 9.5B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 87M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 352 | 1.8B USD | 29 | 30 | |
| 358 | 3.0B USD | 28 | 33 | |
| 358 | 1.7B USD | 28 | 32 | |
| 358 | 9.7B USD | 28 | 30 | |
| 358 | 1.6B USD | 28 | 41 | |
| 358 | 12.3B USD | 28 | 53 | |
| 363 | 34.2B USD | 27 | 46 | |
| 364 | 199.9B USD | 26 | 45 | |
| 364 | 216.3B USD | 26 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score