Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNM · against 367 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #211 of 368 · scores higher than 43% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CNM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 365 reported | 1.31× | 0.55× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 355 reported | 0.91 | 0.85 | 44% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 355 reported | 2.47× | 1.57× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 112.9B MXN (≈$6.1B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 4 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 5 | 47.5B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 96 | 65 | |
| 207 | 6.1B USD | 36 | 55 | |
| 208 | 16.1B USD | 36 | 58 | |
| 209 | 1.70T JPY (≈$11.6B) | 36 | 60 | |
| 210 | 11.1B USD | 36 | 54 | |
| 211 | 8.3B USD | 35 | 54 | |
| 212 | 92.7B SEK (≈$9.3B) | 35 | 50 | |
| 213 | 10.1B USD | 35 | 62 | |
| 214 | 31.1B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 35 | 53 | |
| 215 | 9.1B AUD (≈$6.0B) | 34 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score