Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
How Cinemark Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CNK · against 101 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
73/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 102 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score13 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including CNK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 11.0% vs peer median 8.2%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on assets: 6.0% vs peer median 2.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 82% of peers. Return on invested capital: 19.5% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 93 reported | 19.5% | 8.9% | 78% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 102 reported | 11.0% | 13.7% | 43% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 100 reported | 6.0% | 3.7% | 65% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 96 reported | 45.8% | 8.9% | 95% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 103 reported | 49.4% | 52.8% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.2B GBP (≈$5.4B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 3 | 736.3B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 385.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.0B USD | 98 | 69 | |
| 33 | 32.0B HKD (≈$4.1B) | 78 | 74 | |
| 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score