Ranked #79 of 170 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
21 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including CNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 11.1% vs peer median 10.7%
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on assets: 1.8% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CNA
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 145 reported
11.3%
10.8%
54%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 20 reported
Not reported
13.6%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 170 reported
1.8%
1.3%
66%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 168 reported
11.3%
12.6%
40%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 177 reported
31.1%
0.0%
76%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
