Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CMS · against 57 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 58 · scores higher than 53% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CMS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 58 reported | 1.86× | 1.52× | 30% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 57 reported | 0.31 | 0.46 | 66% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 54 reported | 0.94× | 0.90× | 57% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.3B EUR (≈$22.4B) | 91 | 42 | |
| 2 | 23.3B USD | 89 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 86 | 55 | |
| 4 | 21.3B EUR (≈$23.4B) | 83 | 36 | |
| 5 | 179.3B DKK (≈$26.9B) | 83 | 53 | |
| 24 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 47 | 60 | |
| 25 | 200.5B CNY (≈$28.1B) | 46 | 44 | |
| 26 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 27 | 19.4B EUR (≈$21.4B) | 42 | 52 | |
| 28 | 22.0B USD | 40 | 44 | |
| 29 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 38 | 66 | |
| 30 | 36.3B USD | 35 | 51 | |
| 31 | 28.0B USD | 35 | 46 | |
| 32 | 15.4B USD | 34 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score