Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cummins Inc.
How Cummins Inc. stacks up
CMI · against 82 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #19 of 83 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 3.9% | 3.2% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 6.8% | 5.4% | 80% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 4.9% | 3.3% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | 18.6% | 16.8% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 52 | |
| 2 | 271.0B CNY (≈$37.9B) | 88 | 58 | |
| 3 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 4 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.8B) | 82 | 49 | |
| 5 | 71.0B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 15 | 78.2B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 16 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 54 | 40 | |
| 17 | 627.9B SEK (≈$62.8B) | 53 | 38 | |
| 18 | 101.3B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 19 | 68.9B USD | 51 | 50 | |
| 19 | 53.7B USD | 51 | 56 | |
| 21 | 387.5B HKD (≈$49.6B) | 49 | 48 | |
| 22 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 48 | 41 | |
| 22 | 68.5B USD | 48 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score