Ranked #33 of 57 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
12 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
A mix: stronger return on equity, but weaker return on assets than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on assets: 0.8% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 77% of peers. Return on equity: 14.3% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CM
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 44 reported
49.6%
13.5%
88%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 6 reported
Not reported
66.0%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 57 reported
0.8%
1.0%
43%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 57 reported
15.6%
14.3%
63%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 60 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
