Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLSK · against 264 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #259 of 265 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including CLSK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | CLSK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | -46.4% | 7.9% | 1% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | -23.0% | 9.9% | 8% | Context only | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | -49.6% | 8.0% | 5% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 265 reported | 36.4% | 82.0% | 9% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 21.3B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 50 | |
| 1 | 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 12.7B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.5B) | 98 | 37 | |
| 255 | 21.5B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 3 | ||
| 255 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 3 | 38 | |
| 255 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.1B) | 3 | 61 | |
| 255 | 1.4B USD | 3 | ||
| 259 | 2.1B USD | 2 | ||
| 260 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 1 | ||
| 260 | 26.8B MXN (≈$1.4B) | 1 | 34 | |
| 262 | 21.84T IDR (≈$1.4B) | 0 | ||
| 262 | 3.1B USD | 0 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score