Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ClearOne, Inc.
How ClearOne, Inc. stacks up
CLRO · against 24 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #19 of 25 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score11 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including CLRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -7265.5% vs peer median 6.8%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on assets: -20.7% vs peer median 2.9%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 22 reported | -7265.5% | -9.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 24 reported | Not reported | -11.4% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 25 reported | -20.7% | -5.9% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 25 reported | -60.1% | -22.7% | 42% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 25 reported | 0.0% | 17.5% | 21% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 74 | 79 | |
| 2 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 68 | 72 | |
| 3 | 60M MYR (≈$13M) | 62 | 62 | |
| 3 | 113M MYR (≈$25M) | 62 | 80 | |
| 5 | 192M HKD (≈$25M) | 52 | 45 | |
| 16 | 39.0B KRW (≈$28M) | 7 | 14 | |
| 17 | 194M HKD (≈$25M) | 6 | 31 | |
| 17 | 15M AUD (≈$10M) | 6 | 16 | |
| 19 | 835M TWD (≈$26M) | 5 | 14 | |
| 19 | 15M USD | 5 | 11 | |
| 21 | 223M HKD (≈$28M) | 4 | 50 | |
| 21 | 42M MYR (≈$9M) | 4 | 13 | |
| 23 | 912M TWD (≈$28M) | 1 | 11 | |
| 23 | 26M USD | 1 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score