Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.
How ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. stacks up
CLPT · against 348 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #277 of 349 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score41 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including CLPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: -77.5% vs peer median 4.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 90% of peers. Return on assets: -39.8% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 86% of peers. Operating margin: -73.4% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 313 reported | -77.5% | -0.4% | 12% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 325 reported | -73.4% | 2.1% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 349 reported | -39.8% | -0.4% | 12% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 327 reported | -226.5% | -1.6% | 2% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 365 reported | 62.6% | 36.5% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLPT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 5.5B NOK (≈$523M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 5 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 268 | 276M USD | 17 | 46 | |
| 268 | 519M USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 275 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 16 | 51 | |
| 275 | 302M USD | 16 | 17 | |
| 277 | 296M USD | 15 | 26 | |
| 277 | 275M USD | 15 | 46 | |
| 277 | 424M USD | 15 | 45 | |
| 280 | 11.6B TWD (≈$360M) | 14 | 45 | |
| 280 | 186M USD | 14 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score