Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLNE · against 69 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 70 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CLNE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLNE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 67 reported | 0.58× | 0.55× | 47% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 65 reported | 1.89 | 0.54 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 70 reported | 2.48× | 1.35× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 41 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 43 | 60 | |
| 42 | 2.2B CNY (≈$314M) | 42 | 26 | |
| 43 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 42 | 80 | |
| 44 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 41 | 45 | |
| 45 | 344M USD | 41 | 28 | |
| 46 | 146M GBP (≈$189M) | 40 | 41 | |
| 47 | 665M USD | 34 | 30 | |
| 48 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 34 | 28 | |
| 49 | 580M CAD (≈$424M) | 33 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score