Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
How Clean Energy Fuels Corp. stacks up
CLNE · against 69 other Energy companies of similar size
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #62 of 70 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score11 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including CLNE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -9.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -7.3% vs peer median 11.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: -3.5% vs peer median 9.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLNE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLNE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 67 reported | -3.5% | 6.5% | 15% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 68 reported | -7.3% | 7.1% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 69 reported | -9.2% | 1.7% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 65 reported | -16.4% | 3.4% | 14% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 70 reported | 27.5% | 32.1% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLNE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 94 | 60 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 94 | 88 | |
| 4 | 496M USD | 90 | 85 | |
| 5 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 88 | 69 | |
| 57 | 526M USD | 11 | 36 | |
| 59 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 10 | 49 | |
| 60 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 9 | 37 | |
| 61 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 8 | 34 | |
| 62 | 344M USD | 5 | 28 | |
| 62 | 153M GBP (≈$200M) | 5 | 32 | |
| 62 | 357M AUD (≈$236M) | 5 | 21 | |
| 65 | 590M USD | 4 | 21 | |
| 66 | 534M USD | 3 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score