Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
How Clean Energy Fuels Corp. stacks up
CLNE · against 61 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #22 of 62 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CLNE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 0.5%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLNE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLNE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 5.2% | -1.6% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 36 reported | Not reported | -1.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 62 reported | -1.4% | -1.5% | 51% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLNE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 3 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 92 | 28 | |
| 19 | 290M USD | 61 | 34 | |
| 20 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 56 | 61 | |
| 21 | 534M USD | 55 | 38 | |
| 22 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 54 | 45 | |
| 22 | 344M USD | 54 | 28 | |
| 24 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 51 | 31 | |
| 25 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 48 | 52 | |
| 26 | 674M USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 27 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 45 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score