Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Calumet, Inc.
How Calumet, Inc. stacks up
CLMT · against 289 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #277 of 290 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including CLMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on assets: -4.9% vs peer median 2.5%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 78% of peers. Operating margin: 1.0% vs peer median 7.6%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 65% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.7% vs peer median 6.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 278 reported | 3.7% | 10.0% | 18% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 287 reported | 1.0% | 11.0% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 269 reported | -4.9% | 4.4% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 266 reported | Not reported | 9.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 292 reported | 6.9% | 27.2% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.1B INR (≈$4.6B) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 583.2B INR (≈$7.0B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 3 | 29.0B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 3 | 8.2B CAD (≈$6.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 273 | 17.6B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 18 | 35 | |
| 273 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 18 | 19 | |
| 275 | 28.5B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 17 | 46 | |
| 275 | 2.1B USD | 17 | 39 | |
| 277 | 4.2B USD | 15 | 25 | |
| 277 | 494.4B INR (≈$5.9B) | 15 | 27 | |
| 277 | 2.7B EUR (≈$3.0B) | 15 | 15 | |
| 280 | 8.3B SAR (≈$2.3B) | 10 | 23 | |
| 281 | 5.2B USD | 8 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score