Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLLS · against 120 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #117 of 121 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CLLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 1.96× | 0.21× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | 2.93 | 0.66 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 121 reported | 1.37× | 3.03× | 27% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 4 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 213M USD | 98 | ||
| 113 | 115M USD | 2 | 8 | |
| 114 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 2 | 29 | |
| 115 | 126M USD | 2 | 32 | |
| 116 | 118M USD | 2 | 13 | |
| 117 | 110M USD | 2 | 38 | |
| 118 | 90M USD | 2 | 27 | |
| 119 | 153M AUD (≈$101M) | 1 | 0 | |
| 120 | 133M EUR (≈$147M) | 1 | 36 | |
| 121 | 580M HKD (≈$74M) | 0 | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score