Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cellectis S.A.
How Cellectis S.A. stacks up
CLLS · against 92 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 93 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CLLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 56.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 75.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 75.8% | 5.1% | 90% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 56.1% | 2.7% | 89% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 1 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 1 | 97M USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 5 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 98 | 65 | |
| 5 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 98 | 34 | |
| 5 | 217M AUD (≈$143M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 8 | 110M USD | 97 | 38 | |
| 9 | 10.8B JPY (≈$73M) | 96 | 27 | |
| 9 | 172M USD | 96 | 34 | |
| 11 | 913M HKD (≈$117M) | 94 | 43 | |
| 12 | 144.1B KRW (≈$104M) | 93 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score