Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clean Harbors, Inc.
How Clean Harbors, Inc. stacks up
CLH · against 235 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #146 of 236 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CLH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 225 reported | 2.8% | 3.9% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 236 reported | 6.5% | 7.0% | 45% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 2.9% | 3.7% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 222 reported | 18.8% | 26.9% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 142 | 15.9B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 142 | 25.6B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 146 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 42 | 50 | |
| 146 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 146 | 15.6B USD | 42 | 50 | |
| 146 | 23.7B USD | 42 | 52 | |
| 146 | 9.4B USD | 42 | 48 | |
| 146 | 17.1B CAD (≈$12.5B) | 42 | 62 | |
| 152 | 14.7B USD | 41 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score