Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clearfield, Inc.
How Clearfield, Inc. stacks up
CLFD · against 585 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #390 of 586 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CLFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLFD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 568 reported | 1.7% | 1.4% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 603 reported | 1.6% | 3.7% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 181 reported | 3.0% | 1.9% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 577 reported | 55.5% | 43.2% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLFD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 383 | 671M USD | 25 | 31 | |
| 390 | 6.1B CNY (≈$847M) | 24 | 43 | |
| 390 | 6.3B CNY (≈$883M) | 24 | 35 | |
| 390 | 8.2B TWD (≈$255M) | 24 | 22 | |
| 390 | 443M USD | 24 | 41 | |
| 394 | 3.4B CNY (≈$479M) | 23 | 40 | |
| 394 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 23 | 24 | |
| 394 | 4.9B CNY (≈$679M) | 23 | 46 | |
| 394 | 4.3B CNY (≈$608M) | 23 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score