Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
How Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. stacks up
CLF · against 190 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #162 of 191 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including CLF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -6.8% vs peer median -0.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | -3.0% | 9.2% | 21% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 156 reported | Not reported | 15.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 190 reported | -6.8% | 2.7% | 17% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 5 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 155 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.8B) | 30 | 44 | |
| 159 | 35.8B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 29 | 36 | |
| 159 | 785.0B JPY (≈$5.3B) | 29 | 59 | |
| 161 | 36.7B HKD (≈$4.7B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 162 | 8.1B USD | 27 | 19 | |
| 163 | 52.9B CNY (≈$7.4B) | 26 | 44 | |
| 163 | 44.7B CNY (≈$6.3B) | 26 | 62 | |
| 163 | 45.7B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 26 | 67 | |
| 166 | 1.13T JPY (≈$7.7B) | 24 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score