Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLDX · against 382 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 383 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 90
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)34 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CLDX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLDX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 362 reported | 0.01× | 0.23× | 92% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 365 reported | 0.90 | 0.59 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 368 reported | 11.82× | 2.82× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 1.8B USD | 99 | 42 | |
| 37 | 1.3B USD | 91 | ||
| 38 | 1.8B USD | 91 | ||
| 39 | 3.1B USD | 90 | 39 | |
| 40 | 40.3B SEK (≈$4.0B) | 90 | 79 | |
| 41 | 2.3B USD | 90 | 25 | |
| 42 | 1.5B USD | 90 | 30 | |
| 43 | 1.8B USD | 90 | 30 | |
| 44 | 1.9B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 45 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 89 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score