Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chatham Lodging Trust
How Chatham Lodging Trust stacks up
CLDT · against 241 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #74 of 242 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score30 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including CLDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 260 reported | 0.5% | 5.5% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 241 reported | 7.8% | 5.6% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 10.4% | 9.2% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 261 reported | 103.2% | 119.7% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 70 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 73 | 55 | |
| 70 | 551M EUR (≈$606M) | 73 | 67 | |
| 72 | 1.1B SGD (≈$865M) | 72 | 67 | |
| 72 | 440M USD | 72 | 64 | |
| 74 | 735M USD | 71 | 44 | |
| 74 | 4.1B SEK (≈$412M) | 71 | 67 | |
| 74 | 1.2B SGD (≈$944M) | 71 | 54 | |
| 74 | 592M CAD (≈$432M) | 71 | 61 | |
| 74 | 572M EUR (≈$629M) | 71 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score