Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chatham Lodging Trust
How Chatham Lodging Trust stacks up
CLDT · against 267 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #190 of 268 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score31 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including CLDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 70% of peers. Return on assets: 1.0% vs peer median 2.1%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 67% of peers. Operating margin: 12.5% vs peer median 26.8%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 63% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.7% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 261 reported | 2.7% | 3.4% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 256 reported | 12.5% | 26.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 262 reported | 1.0% | 2.1% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 259 reported | 1.6% | 5.2% | 36% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 269 reported | 49.1% | 53.7% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 7.7B BRL (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 2 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 2 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 186 | 795M USD | 30 | 48 | |
| 186 | 1.3B USD | 30 | 43 | |
| 190 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 29 | 67 | |
| 190 | 3.1B HKD (≈$400M) | 29 | 26 | |
| 190 | 735M USD | 29 | 44 | |
| 190 | 4.0B SEK (≈$399M) | 29 | 16 | |
| 194 | 1.1B USD | 28 | 43 | |
| 194 | 14.3B MXN (≈$772M) | 28 | 51 | |
| 194 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 28 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score