Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CION Investment Corporation
How CION Investment Corporation stacks up
CION · against 61 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #46 of 62 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CION · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.8% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CION, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CION | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 0.9% | 5.4% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | 13.2% | 8.2% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 198.7% | 109.3% | 91% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CION| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 12.8B THB (≈$359M) | 97 | 55 | |
| 5 | 6.8B THB (≈$191M) | 96 | 41 | |
| 42 | 530M EUR (≈$583M) | 41 | 43 | |
| 43 | 41.9B INR (≈$502M) | 38 | 67 | |
| 44 | 11.7B THB (≈$328M) | 37 | 53 | |
| 45 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 36 | 49 | |
| 46 | 336M USD | 35 | 29 | |
| 47 | 555.6B CLP (≈$611M) | 34 | 50 | |
| 48 | 3.6B CNY (≈$502M) | 33 | 42 | |
| 49 | 331M EUR (≈$364M) | 31 | 33 | |
| 50 | 333M EUR (≈$366M) | 26 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score