Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CI&T Inc.
How CI&T Inc. stacks up
CINT · against 553 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 554 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score73 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including CINT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.2% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CINT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CINT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | 9.0% | 1.4% | 92% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 14.9% | 3.9% | 89% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | 8.3% | 2.1% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 544 reported | 81.8% | 44.5% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CINT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 6 | 85.2B JPY (≈$579M) | 98 | 91 | |
| 6 | 40.2B JPY (≈$273M) | 98 | 67 | |
| 6 | 286M SGD (≈$217M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 6 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 6 | 397M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 6 | 244M EUR (≈$269M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 6 | 218M USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 21 | 10.3B TWD (≈$319M) | 97 | 79 | |
| 21 | 67.2B JPY (≈$457M) | 97 | 92 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score