Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CI&T Inc.
How CI&T Inc. stacks up
CINT · against 555 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #164 of 556 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CINT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 30.2% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CINT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CINT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 565 reported | 11.5% | 3.9% | 71% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 30.2% | 3.4% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 551 reported | 4.9% | 1.5% | 61% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CINT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 3.4B CNY (≈$482M) | 99 | 91 | |
| 1 | 218M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 4 | 67.2B JPY (≈$457M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 4 | 287M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 164 | 18.4B TWD (≈$571M) | 59 | 51 | |
| 164 | 5.6B CNY (≈$790M) | 59 | 49 | |
| 164 | 109.4B JPY (≈$744M) | 59 | 40 | |
| 164 | 111.4B JPY (≈$757M) | 59 | 64 | |
| 164 | 397M USD | 59 | 67 | |
| 164 | 469M EUR (≈$516M) | 59 | 64 | |
| 164 | 283M USD | 59 | 76 | |
| 164 | 404M USD | 59 | 57 | |
| 172 | 1.02T KRW (≈$735M) | 58 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score