Ranked #5 of 121 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
13 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including CINF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on equity, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on equity: 20.0% vs peer median 10.7%
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 95% of peers. Return on assets: 7.7% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CINF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CINF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 94 reported
26.2%
11.2%
83%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 9 reported
Not reported
19.9%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 121 reported
7.7%
1.3%
98%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 121 reported
21.5%
13.9%
88%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 125 reported
31.1%
0.0%
79%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
