Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Colliers International Group Inc.
How Colliers International Group Inc. stacks up
CIGI · against 130 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #57 of 131 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CIGI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CIGI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CIGI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 2.0% | 4.9% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 129 reported | 7.3% | 5.5% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 4.3% | 6.0% | 32% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 29.3% | 91.4% | 9% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CIGI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 52 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 56 | 56 | |
| 52 | 5.7B USD | 56 | 56 | |
| 55 | 3.8B USD | 55 | 42 | |
| 55 | 5.9B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 57 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 57 | 5.2B USD | 53 | 54 | |
| 57 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 57 | 3.3B USD | 53 | 78 | |
| 61 | 4.2B USD | 52 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score