Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CIB · against 136 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #129 of 137 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including CIB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its book yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | CIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 8.9% | 8.3% | 61% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | Not reported | 9.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 3.6% | 8.2% | 28% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | Not reported | 73.8% | — | — | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 2 | 169.0B HKD (≈$21.6B) | 97 | ||
| 3 | 133.9B HKD (≈$17.1B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 3 | 541.0B TRY (≈$16.2B) | 91 | 78 | |
| 5 | 1.07T INR (≈$12.8B) | 90 | 66 | |
| 127 | 39.1B USD | 6 | ||
| 127 | 27.2B USD | 6 | 62 | |
| 129 | 27.9B USD | 5 | 51 | |
| 129 | 19.1B USD | 5 | 28 | |
| 129 | 21.9B USD | 5 | 16 | |
| 129 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 5 | 54 | |
| 133 | 19.1B USD | 3 | 44 | |
| 133 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 3 | 22 | |
| 135 | 11.9B USD | 2 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score