Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Cigna Group
How The Cigna Group stacks up
CI · against 42 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 43 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 33.0% vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.9% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 7.8% | 9.3% | 38% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 35 reported | 33.0% | 18.0% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 14.9% | 7.4% | 79% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 3 | 56.0B USD | 86 | 39 | |
| 4 | 67.60T KRW (≈$48.7B) | 82 | 72 | |
| 5 | 126.5B USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 13 | 45.2B USD | 71 | 46 | |
| 14 | 116.5B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 14 | 49.1B USD | 69 | 69 | |
| 16 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 64 | 75 | |
| 16 | 78.1B USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 18 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 63 | 75 | |
| 18 | 126.1B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 20 | 50.2B USD | 58 | 49 | |
| 20 | 52.9B USD | 58 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score