Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chewy, Inc.
How Chewy, Inc. stacks up
CHWY · against 201 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
80/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #50 of 202 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including CHWY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 89.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHWY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHWY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 202 reported | 5.9% | 5.8% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 89.2% | 6.8% | 91% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 201 reported | 6.4% | 6.1% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHWY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 524.8B INR (≈$6.3B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 45 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 81 | 77 | |
| 45 | 10.5B USD | 81 | 57 | |
| 45 | 16.6B USD | 81 | 58 | |
| 45 | 550.9B INR (≈$6.6B) | 81 | 71 | |
| 50 | 8.9B USD | 80 | 53 | |
| 50 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 80 | 75 | |
| 50 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 80 | 45 | |
| 50 | 6.7B USD | 80 | 52 | |
| 54 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 79 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score