Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
How Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. stacks up
CHT · against 30 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #21 of 31 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 31 reported | 2.7% | 7.0% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 22 reported | 4.1% | 2.8% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 31 reported | 2.9% | 4.9% | 33% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 3 | 23.8B USD | 93 | 61 | |
| 4 | 19.2B USD | 91 | 67 | |
| 5 | 9.39T JPY (≈$63.9B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 16 | 25.3B EUR (≈$27.8B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 18 | 36.1B USD | 56 | 48 | |
| 19 | 67.0B SGD (≈$50.9B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 20 | 10.49T JPY (≈$71.3B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 21 | 37.7B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 22 | 25.1B USD | 43 | 66 | |
| 23 | 165.2B HKD (≈$21.1B) | 42 | 58 | |
| 23 | 41.7B USD | 42 | 37 | |
| 25 | 55.8B AUD (≈$36.8B) | 36 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score