Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CHRW · against 235 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #175 of 236 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CHRW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CHRW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 231 reported | 1.21× | 0.54× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 228 reported | 0.95 | 0.86 | 40% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 228 reported | 1.58× | 1.48× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 171 | 10.2B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 172 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 25 | 50 | |
| 173 | 16.5B USD | 25 | 57 | |
| 174 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 25 | 61 | |
| 175 | 15.6B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 176 | 8.7B USD | 24 | 53 | |
| 177 | 8.6B USD | 24 | 41 | |
| 178 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.8B) | 23 | 57 | |
| 179 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 23 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score