Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CHRN · against 468 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #379 of 469 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)41 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CHRN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CHRN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 458 reported | 0.67× | 0.23× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 449 reported | 0.98 | 0.86 | 40% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 465 reported | 0.51× | 1.88× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 375 | 275.4B JPY (≈$1.9B) | 21 | 41 | |
| 376 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) |
| 21 |
| 23 |
| 377 | 98.4B TWD (≈$3.0B) | 21 | 44 |
| 378 | 12.0B SEK (≈$1.2B) | 21 | 56 |
| 379 | 2.0B USD | 21 | 35 |
| 380 | 122.6B TWD (≈$3.8B) | 20 | 23 |
| 381 | 48.3B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 20 | 39 |
| 382 | 1.4B USD | 20 | 72 |
| 383 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 20 | 50 |