Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chord Energy Corporation
How Chord Energy Corporation stacks up
CHRD · against 91 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 92 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CHRD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 19.2% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.3% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 234.0% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHRD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHRD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 92 reported | 19.2% | 2.5% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 80 reported | 234.0% | 1.8% | 96% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 16.3% | -0.1% | 86% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHRD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 5.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 6 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 6 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.1B) | 96 | 69 | |
| 6 | 7.0B USD | 96 | 44 | |
| 9 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 10 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score