Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CHGG · against 44 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 45 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CHGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CHGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 44 reported | 0.43× | 0.49× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 48 reported | 2.19 | 0.31 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 50 reported | 1.17× | 1.21× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 218M MYR (≈$48M) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 185.5B KRW (≈$134M) | 95 | 70 | |
| 3 | 6.5B JPY (≈$44M) | 93 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2.7B THB (≈$75M) | 91 | 69 | |
| 5 | 1.9B THB (≈$53M) | 91 | 65 | |
| 31 | 225M MYR (≈$49M) | 23 | 18 | |
| 32 | 40M GBP (≈$52M) | 22 | 16 | |
| 33 | 166.2B KRW (≈$120M) | 18 | 41 | |
| 34 | 129M EUR (≈$142M) | 16 | 37 | |
| 35 | 72M USD | 14 | 26 | |
| 36 | 1.1B HKD (≈$141M) | 13 | 63 | |
| 37 | 69M EUR (≈$76M) | 11 | 10 | |
| 38 | 549M NOK (≈$52M) | 10 | 26 | |
| 39 | 73M AUD (≈$48M) | 10 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score