Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chegg, Inc.
How Chegg, Inc. stacks up
CHGG · against 49 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #48 of 50 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including CHGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -21.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -39.0% vs peer median 2.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHGG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | -39.0% | -2.1% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 22 reported | Not reported | -14.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 49 reported | -21.1% | 1.8% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHGG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M NOK (≈$84M) | 99 | 36 | |
| 2 | 308M SAR (≈$83M) | 97 | 42 | |
| 3 | 379M MYR (≈$83M) | 95 | 87 | |
| 4 | 446M HKD (≈$57M) | 93 | 55 | |
| 5 | 336M MYR (≈$74M) | 90 | 57 | |
| 45 | 449M MYR (≈$99M) | 4 | 41 | |
| 46 | 299M HKD (≈$38M) | 3 | 23 | |
| 47 | 125M USD | 2 | 3 | |
| 48 | 238M SAR (≈$64M) | 0 | 3 | |
| 48 | 72M USD | 0 | 26 | |
| 48 | 40M GBP (≈$52M) | 0 | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score