Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CHCO · against 246 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #138 of 247 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CHCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | CHCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 269 reported | 3.2% | 9.3% | 26% | Context only | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 242 reported | 11.3% | 17.6% | 42% | 100% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 265 reported | 2.9% | 7.5% | 26% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.2B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 95 | 50 | |
| 1 | 20.3B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 95 | 54 | |
| 1 | 21.1B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 95 | 61 | |
| 1 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 95 | 47 | |
| 135 | 88.9B INR (≈$1.1B) | 47 | 56 | |
| 135 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.3B GBP (≈$3.0B) |
| 47 |
| 56 |
| 137 | 1.4B USD | 46 | 50 |
| 138 | 3.1B USD | 45 | 48 |
| 138 | 2.0B USD | 45 | 48 |
| 138 | 2.6B USD | 45 | 52 |
| 141 | 1.5B USD | 44 | 46 |
| 141 | 266.0B INR (≈$3.2B) | 44 | 60 |
| 141 | 2.5B USD | 44 | 42 |