Ranked #20 of 396 · scores higher than 95% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
32 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Lower relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 93 among Consumer Cyclical companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲less borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: stronger than 75% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.19× vs peer median 0.46×
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 89% of peers. Current ratio: 3.11× vs peer median 1.48×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CHA
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 385 reported
0.19×
0.48×
76%
33%
BetaLower is better · 386 reported
Not reported
0.68
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 383 reported
3.37×
1.49×
91%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
