Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.
How Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. stacks up
CGEM · against 484 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #332 of 485 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score154 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including CGEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -32.6% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -20.2% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -15.7% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CGEM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CGEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | -19.7% | 1.3% | 8% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 491 reported | -32.6% | 4.2% | 5% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | -16.5% | -2.4% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 481 reported | 31.7% | 41.5% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CGEM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 14.8B MXN (≈$800M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 332 | 593M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 332 | 1.7B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 332 | 675M USD | 8 | ||
| 332 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 50 | |
| 332 | 968M USD | 8 | 37 | |
| 332 | 560M USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 332 | 1.2B USD | 8 | ||
| 332 | 827M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 332 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score