Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Celsius Holdings, Inc.
How Celsius Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CELH · against 115 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #101 of 116 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CELH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 4.5%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.1% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CELH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CELH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 0.8% | 5.0% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 7.2% | 8.8% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 50 reported | 6.1% | 6.7% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 15.8% | 41.9% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CELH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 4 | 3.8B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 4 | 5.5B USD | 88 | 84 | |
| 97 | 22.5B MYR (≈$4.9B) | 24 | 57 | |
| 99 | 54.1B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 23 | 41 | |
| 99 | 677.0B INR (≈$8.1B) | 23 | 58 | |
| 101 | 41.8B CNY (≈$5.8B) | 21 | 50 | |
| 101 | 7.6B USD | 21 | 45 | |
| 103 | 849.3B INR (≈$10.2B) | 20 | 56 | |
| 103 | 8.2B USD | 20 | 17 | |
| 105 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 19 | 76 | |
| 105 | 1.52T JPY (≈$10.4B) | 19 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score