Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cadre Holdings, Inc.
How Cadre Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CDRE · against 819 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #480 of 820 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score72 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CDRE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDRE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDRE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 819 reported | 2.6% | 4.2% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 829 reported | 6.3% | 7.5% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 5.9% | 3.8% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 821 reported | 26.1% | 53.0% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDREScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score