Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to COPT Defense Properties
How COPT Defense Properties stacks up
CDP · against 152 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #88 of 153 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CDP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.9% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 153 reported | 4.5% | 5.2% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 132 reported | 13.9% | 10.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 150 reported | 4.1% | 6.2% | 42% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 1 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 3 | 4.1B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 3 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 96 | 58 | |
| 83 | 3.0B CAD (≈$2.2B) | 56 | 46 | |
| 85 | 49.88T IDR (≈$3.1B) | 55 | 57 | |
| 85 | 3.9B SGD (≈$3.0B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 87 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 61 | |
| 88 | 3.8B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 88 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 90 | 319.2B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 52 | 48 | |
| 90 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 | |
| 92 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 51 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score