Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CareDx, Inc.
How CareDx, Inc. stacks up
CDNA · against 588 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
43/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #215 of 589 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CDNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Healthcare peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.3% vs peer median 4.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 1.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.8% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 577 reported | 2.4% | -4.3% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 0.3% | -0.8% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 553 reported | 1.8% | -2.3% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 9.3% | 25.9% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDNA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 256M USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 595M USD | 96 | 97 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 2 | 289M USD | 96 | 57 | |
| 2 | 810M USD | 96 | 69 | |
| 210 | 5.7B USD | 44 | 38 | |
| 210 | 1.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 210 | 66.3B USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 210 | 5.9B USD | 44 | 39 | |
| 215 | 4.6B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 215 | 1.7B USD | 43 | 35 | |
| 215 | 16.9B USD | 43 | 37 | |
| 215 | 15.7B USD | 43 | 33 | |
| 219 | 56.7B USD | 42 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score