Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cardlytics, Inc.
How Cardlytics, Inc. stacks up
CDLX · against 10 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
8/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #5 of 11 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including CDLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 92% of peers. Revenue growth: -16.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -7.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDLX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 11 reported | -16.2% | -16.2% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1 reported | Not reported | -78.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 10 reported | -7.9% | -13.6% | 67% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDLX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.3B KRW (≈$23M) | 83 | 49 | |
| 2 | 7M USD | 33 | 20 | |
| 3 | 149M HKD (≈$19M) | 23 | 34 | |
| 4 | 62M MYR (≈$14M) | 9 | 57 | |
| 5 | 12M USD | 8 | 6 | |
| 5 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 8 | 63 | |
| 7 | 17M USD | 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 0 | 26 | |
| 8 | 109M HKD (≈$14M) | 0 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score