Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cadeler A/S
How Cadeler A/S stacks up
CDLR · against 639 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 640 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score61 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CDLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 330.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 80.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: 149.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 645 reported | 149.4% | 5.9% | 100% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 536 reported | 330.6% | 7.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 636 reported | 80.0% | 5.2% | 100% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 6 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 62 | |
| 6 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 6 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score