Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCSI · against 612 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #599 of 613 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)62 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CCSI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCSI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 583 reported | 13.62× | 0.21× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 592 reported | 1.92 | 0.67 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 610 reported | 1.90× | 1.88× | 51% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 5 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 595 | 1.06T KRW (≈$766M) | 3 | 55 | |
| 596 | 742M USD | 3 | 61 | |
| 597 | 772M USD | 3 | 21 | |
| 598 | 457M USD | 3 | 47 | |
| 599 | 662M USD | 2 | 57 | |
| 600 | 12.8B TWD (≈$395M) | 2 | 8 | |
| 601 | 667.7B KRW (≈$481M) | 2 | 52 | |
| 602 | 475M USD | 2 | 31 | |
| 603 | 686M USD | 2 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score