Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
How Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CCOI · against 102 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #49 of 103 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CCOI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -47.2% vs peer median 7.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -14.9% vs peer median 2.9%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 16.0% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCOI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCOI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | -15.9% | 0.2% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | 6.0% | 8.2% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | -47.2% | 8.7% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | -12.0% | 72.1% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCOI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 4 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 45 | 71.8B JPY (≈$489M) | 56 | 64 | |
| 46 | 10.9B THB (≈$307M) | 55 | 49 | |
| 47 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 52 | 76 | |
| 48 | 388M USD | 51 | 29 | |
| 49 | 303M USD | 47 | 34 | |
| 50 | 325M USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 51 | 882M AUD (≈$582M) | 43 | 39 | |
| 52 | 286M CAD (≈$209M) | 37 | 52 | |
| 53 | 324M USD | 34 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score